Thursday, February 23, 2006

Portion presentation

I've been eating better, wiser, LESS since the beginning of the year, and my ticker above shows the result. We've had a little discussion on the Quilters' Lounge about the HUGE sizes of restaurant meals, and it's true. Fast(er) food is, in my humble opinion, a HUGE factor in the widening of America (and Canada, Europe, Asia...) Starches and fat are cheap and take up lots of room on a big plate. What a bargain, all that food, for $7.99!

My upbringing taught me that you take what you'll eat, and you better eat what you take. All of it. So when the server brings me a HUGE plate with pasta, sauce, chicken, cheese... well, my inner child knows I'll be sitting there until it's done. All of it. Even if I don't want all of it. I'm getting better. I order lunch sized portions, I ask for a to go box at the BEGINNING of the meal and set a good portion aside before I even start to eat. I'm not hungry at the end of the smaller meal, in fact, more often than not, I'm comfortably full. There have even been occasions where I can't finish the smaller size. What the heck did I need a huge plateful for?!

At home, we all eat off smaller plates than the 12" restaurant behemoths. I eat most meals from an 8" luncheon plate, and I'm sure to load up the plate with garnishes - celery, carrots, extra vegetables, pickles. Or a pretty fan of apple slices, a rosette of clementine sections, a side salad. Presentation goes a LONG way when you're trying to control portions. 2 eggs, 3 strips of bacon and some wheat toast spread out over a big plate looks sad and pathetic (and skimpy!) Choose a smaller plate, add a slice of melon and some strawberries, and voila - it's beautiful!

Back to that QL discussion, Rian detailed her order - a patty melt, salad, cottage cheese. That's a pretty standard "dieter's special" around here. I'm betting it came attractively plated on a smallish dish. Had that meal arrived on a 12" plate, sans garnish, unembellished, un-presented I'm thinking her observation of the next table's "Rancher's Breakfast" with extra biscuits and gravy would have involved a little more salivating, a little less disbelief at the sheer volume of food. I too wonder if they finished - bet they did. And I probably would have too (without the biscuits) because that's the way I used to eat. Completely without thought to what that kind of slop trough eating was doing to me.

Fitzy lamented the presentation of her dinner the other night - halibut and extra vegetables. It arrived, amidst the heaped plates of her guests, sad and lonely - "lost on the white china sea." How unfortunate. Had the kitchen taken the tiny effort to simply grab a smaller plate, Fitzy's dinner would have looked just as appealing as her tablemates'.

We're going for thin and healthy, not anorexic and unattractive. Our dinners shouldn't look that way either.

No comments: